This website collects cookies to deliver better user experience. Cookie Policy
Accept
Sign In
The Wall Street Publication
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Was Jan. 6 really a ‘violent insurrection’?
Share
The Wall Street PublicationThe Wall Street Publication
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.
The Wall Street Publication > Blog > Trending > Was Jan. 6 really a ‘violent insurrection’?
Trending

Was Jan. 6 really a ‘violent insurrection’?

Editorial Board Published February 12, 2022
Share
Was Jan. 6 really a ‘violent insurrection’?
SHARE

OPINION:

The Department of Justice likes to remind us occasionally that, since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 725 people have been arrested for crimes related to the events of that day. More than 165 individuals have pleaded guilty to federal charges. Many fewer (22) have pled to felony offenses. None has gone to trial. Sentences have ranged from probation to jail terms denominated in months.

As we have noted before, no one has been charged with treason or insurrection. Under pressure to do something that at least sounded material, the Department of Justice recently charged a handful of folks with seditious conspiracy. That sounds pretty bad. Is it?

Well, here’s how the U.S. Code describes sedition: “If two or more persons … conspire to … by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof …”

It doesn’t seem like that provision — no doubt the one prosecutors will use in court — meets anyone’s definition of “insurrection.” It reads more like a federal version of obstruction of justice or resisting arrest.

Notably, the prosecutors have not charged anyone with insurrection, which is defined in Title 18, Section 2383 of the U.S. Code as: “Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.”

I mention all this because the minority leader in the U.S. Senate, whom I greatly admire, recently said: “Jan. 6 was a violent insurrection.”

As an officer of the court, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, should know better. No one has been found guilty of insurrection. No one has even been charged with it. Moreover, the Capitol police obviously didn’t think the situation was that violent: There were no gunshots fired (by either the police or the protesters) except for those that killed Ashli Babbitt.

Mr. McConnell graduated from the University of Kentucky College of Law in 1967 and was president of the Student Bar Association. He’s a lawyer, an officer of the court, and an elected official who has taken multiple oaths to defend the Constitution, including all that “due process” language. His public statements about matters of possible criminal behavior should be more measured and grounded in facts.

Even the DOJ ends all its press releases on this topic with the admonishment: “An indictment or complaint is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.”

This need for precision and grounding statements in facts is not merely a question of debating etiquette. Some intend to use the events of Jan. 6, 2021, to disqualify potential candidates from running for office.

In North Carolina, the Board of Elections is seeking to remove Republican Rep. Madison Cawthorn from the ballot because of a speech he gave that day.

In a court filing, election board members argued that they can remove Mr. Cawthorn under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, precluding candidates who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States. Leaving aside trials, juries, evidence, assumption of innocence, etc., the filing asserted: “The state has the authority to police which candidates should or should not be disqualified per section 3 of the 14th Amendment.”

In Indiana, a potential challenger to GOP Rep. Jim Banks has filed a petition to remove Mr. Banks from the ballot because of a vote he took on Jan. 6, 2021. The petition explicitly mentions Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Letting bureaucrats decide who gets to run for office — especially without any legitimate process — based on a speech or a vote is a very bad idea that will, of course, eventually go both ways. Remember, a handful of Democrats voted against certifying the election results in 2016.

We live in dangerous times, so clarity and precision in both speech and thought are essential.  

The Jan. 6 protesters were wrong about the law governing the ability of Congress or the vice president to alter the results of the 2020 presidential election. The results of that election did not trigger any constitutional provision permitting Congress to intervene in the result. The protest exceeded lawful bounds, and individuals should be held legally accountable.

But it was not an insurrection, and until courts of competent jurisdiction say otherwise, we should be careful with our language.

Worrying about the past is a sucker’s game and at odds with the American character. This nation, fortunately, has been built by people — from the voyagers on the Mayflower to the ridiculously rich kids in Silicon Valley — who look forward.

Living in the past is a mistake. So is being wrong about what happened in the past.

• Michael McKenna, a columnist for The Washington Times, is a co-host of “The Unregulated” podcast. He was most recently a deputy assistant to the president and deputy director of the Office of Legislative Affairs at the White House.

TAGGED:TrendingWall Street Publication
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article After Her Husband’s Illness, a Wife Needs a New Financial Plan After Her Husband’s Illness, a Wife Needs a New Financial Plan
Next Article Canada Police Face Growing Crowd in Effort to Clear Crucial Bridge to U.S. Canada Police Face Growing Crowd in Effort to Clear Crucial Bridge to U.S.

Editor's Pick

Nicki Minaj Calls Cardi B’s Daughter ‘Ugly’; Cardi Shoots Again That Nicki’s Son Is Nonverbal Because of Drug Use Throughout Being pregnant

Nicki Minaj Calls Cardi B’s Daughter ‘Ugly’; Cardi Shoots Again That Nicki’s Son Is Nonverbal Because of Drug Use Throughout Being pregnant

Studying Time: 3 minutes The Nicki Minaj vs. Cardi B beef has been occurring for years. Like, mainly for so…

By Editorial Board 4 Min Read
The Seasonal Reset: 38 Simple Fall Updates for Max Coziness
The Seasonal Reset: 38 Simple Fall Updates for Max Coziness

The primary crisp morning of fall at all times seems like a…

8 Min Read
BMW recollects almost 200K autos as a consequence of fireplace danger, says house owners ought to park exterior
BMW recollects almost 200K autos as a consequence of fireplace danger, says house owners ought to park exterior

Try what's clicking on FoxBusiness.com. Practically 200,000 BMW house owners are being…

3 Min Read

Oponion

Prime 60 Distinctive Christmas Reward Concepts for Girls 2024 | Fashion

Prime 60 Distinctive Christmas Reward Concepts for Girls 2024 | Fashion

FYI After our newest spherical of analysis, we’ve topped the…

October 1, 2024

‘For the primary time since 1941 there isn’t a alliance between a US authorities and European nations’

President Donald Trump’s proposed US takeover…

February 21, 2025

Trump makes a daring prediction in regards to the 2024 presidential election

UNIONDALE, N.Y. – Standing in entrance…

September 19, 2024

7 Least expensive Rolex Watches For Males, Least Costly in 2024 | Fashion

We independently consider all really useful…

November 19, 2024

Prince Harry: Planning Christmas WITHOUT Meghan Markle?!

Sure, Prince Harry is planning Christmas…

November 21, 2024

You Might Also Like

Deborah Dalton: Award-Winning Novels and Film
EntertainmentTrending

Deborah Dalton: Award-Winning Novels and Film

Topeka, Kansas. Deborah Dalton’s career has taken a path as remarkable as the worlds she creates on the page. Long…

2 Min Read
“Journey Within” Masterclass with Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
LifestyleTrending

“Journey Within” Masterclass with Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

World-Renowned Meditation Leader Returns to North Texas Dallas, TX — This fall, the Art of Living Foundation in Dallas will…

5 Min Read
Interview with Canadian Futures Trader: Inside the Journey of a Modern Futures Trader
LifestyleTrending

Interview with Canadian Futures Trader: Inside the Journey of a Modern Futures Trader

Paul, Futures Times: Thanks for joining us today, Chris. To start off, can you tell us about your background and…

7 Min Read
Violet Brandani: Redefining Digital Streaming With Charm and Creativity
EntertainmentTrending

Violet Brandani: Redefining Digital Streaming With Charm and Creativity

In today’s fast-paced digital era, countless creators appear on our screens, but only a few manage to truly capture our…

3 Min Read
The Wall Street Publication

About Us

The Wall Street Publication, a distinguished part of the Enspirers News Group, stands as a beacon of excellence in journalism. Committed to delivering unfiltered global news, we pride ourselves on our trusted coverage of Politics, Business, Technology, and more.

Company

  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability

Term of Use

  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices

© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?