By DEEPTI HAJELA, Related Press
NEW YORK — The slang time period on the middle of a political brouhaha swirling round former FBI Director James Comey is an outdated one, doubtless originating as food-service-industry jargon earlier than extending to different contexts. A few of that unfold has given rise to accusations from Republicans that it was meant as a menace to President Donald Trump.
In a since-deleted Instagram put up, Comey wrote “cool shell formation on my beach walk” to accompany a photograph of shells displayed within the shapes of “86 47.”
He stated in a follow-up put up that he took it solely as a political message since Trump is the forty seventh president, and to “86” one thing will be to do away with it, like a rowdy patron at a bar or one thing that’s now not needed.
However Trump and different Republicans took it extra ominously. They are saying Comey, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship, was advocating violence in opposition to the Republican president, on condition that the slang time period has at instances been used as a technique to imply somebody’s killing.
It in all probability began in eating places practically a century in the past
The slang origins of “86” return to codes utilized in diners and eating places as workers shorthand within the Nineteen Thirties or so, stated Jesse Sheidlower, adjunct assistant professor in Columbia College’s writing program and previously editor-at-large for the Oxford English Dictionary.
It meant that one thing on the menu was now not out there. Over time, he stated, associated makes use of developed.
“The original sense is, we are out of an item. But there are a bunch of obvious metaphorical extensions for this,” he stated. “86 is something that’s not there, something that shouldn’t be there like an undesirable customer. Then it’s a verb, meaning to throw someone out. These are fairly obvious and clear semantic development from the idea of being out of something.”
He stated there have been makes use of of it as a euphemism for killing somebody, as in sure fiction tales, however that utilization isn’t practically as widespread. Extra doubtless it means to jettison one thing that’s now not helpful — a definition parodied within the well-liked Sixties TV present “Get Smart,” whose lead character was identified — wink, nudge — as Agent 86.
That kind of which means is mirrored within the entry for “86” from Merriam-Webster, the dictionary utilized by The Related Press. That definition says the which means is “to throw out,” “to get rid of” or “to refuse service to.” Whereas referencing that there have been makes use of of it to imply killing, the dictionary stated, “We do not enter this sense, due to its relative recency and sparseness of use.”
However Trump and his administration insist that was the intent of the utilization in Comey’s preliminary put up Thursday.
Homeland Safety Secretary Kristi Noem testifies throughout a Home Committee on Homeland Safety listening to, Wednesday, Could 14, 2025, in Washington. (AP Picture/Kevin Wolf)
The utilization has prompted a federal investigation
Trump’s administration is investigating.
Comey stated on social media: “I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence.”
The connection between the president and Comey has been strained for years. Trump fired Comey as FBI director in 2017, early in Trump’s first time period. In 2018, in a e-book, Comey stated Trump was unethical and “untethered to truth.”
{That a} slang reference could cause this sort of agita isn’t a surprise, particularly not at a time just like the one we live in, stated Nicole Holliday, performing affiliate professor of linguistics on the College of California, Berkeley.
“I think that because we are in a hyperpartisan, polarized culture, everything is a Rorschach test,” she stated. “We’re very sensitive about any indication that people are part of our in group or part of the out group.”
Language could be a fraught topic as a result of language and the which means of phrases will be fluid primarily based on context or tradition or different elements. “We’re always kind of navigating this issue of, ‘Well, I said this word and it meant X. But you heard this word and you thought it meant Y,’” she stated.
That navigation will be onerous sufficient when it’s person-to-person direct dialog. Taking it on-line the best way a lot of our fashionable discourse is makes it much more so, she stated.
“In real life, when you have a conversation with a human being, you are negotiating meaning. (But) when somebody posts … There’s no space. This is why people are always arguing themselves to death in the comments,” Holliday stated.
“We’re not meant to communicate like this about serious issues,” she stated. “Really, we’re not.”
___
Related Press author Eric Tucker in Washington contributed to this report.
Initially Printed: Could 20, 2025 at 9:19 AM PDT
