This website collects cookies to deliver better user experience. Cookie Policy
Accept
Sign In
The Wall Street Publication
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
Share
The Wall Street PublicationThe Wall Street Publication
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.
The Wall Street Publication > Blog > Trending > Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
Trending

Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion

Editorial Board Published December 2, 2021
Share
Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
SHARE

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said during Wednesday’s oral arguments in a case challenging Mississippi’s abortion law that “not much has changed” since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, but pro-life advocates disagreed, citing the science.

When Roe was decided, fetal viability began at about 28 weeks of gestation. Thanks to medical advances, the fetus is now considered viable at 23 or 24 weeks, and sometimes earlier. A baby girl born in Texas in 2014 at 21 weeks of gestation, weighing just 14.5 ounces, is reportedly thriving.

“The advances in science, technology, and medicine since 1973 that point to the humanity of the child and in particular the science of fetal pain,” the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List said in a Wednesday statement. “The other side claimed nothing has changed since 1973. They couldn’t be more wrong.”

Pro-life advocates jumped in after Justices Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor raised doubts about whether the landscape had changed since Roe and the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision, which barred states from prohibiting abortions before fetal viability.

“I guess what strikes me when I look at this case is that, you know, not much has changed since Roe and Casey,” Justice Kagan said during oral arguments. “People think it’s right or wrong based on the things that they have always thought it was right and wrong for.”

That may be true on the political front but not on the scientific front, according to pro-life advocates.

They argue that nearly 50 years of medical advances have swung the balance in their favor by improving survivability for premature infants by, for example, allowing doctors to treat conditions in the womb.

Seven years after Roe, University of California San Francisco doctors performed the first successful fetal surgery. Such procedures are now increasingly common midpregnancy to treat conditions such as spina bifida and heart defects. The unborn baby may also be administered anesthesia for open fetal surgery.

“As a practicing diagnostic radiologist, I can attest that advances in ultrasound technology continue to astonish the medical community as to the humanity of the unborn child, a truth and medical reality that we can now see clearly in the earliest weeks of life,” said Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, a senior fellow for The Catholic Association. 

The 2018 Mississippi law at issue in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization bans most abortions after 15 weeks of gestation. At this point, all the major organs have formed, each finger moves separately, and the body responds to touch and taste, according to the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute.

“This case is before the Supreme Court today in large part because Americans have seen the evolving science and increasingly want a voice in a question of great moral consequence,” said Dr. Pozo.

Justice Kagan: “Not much has changed since Roe and Casey.” Actually, there have been huge advancements in science and medicine, which CLI’s Dr. David Prentice discussed in this recent article: https://t.co/jenGmijAeS

— Charlotte Lozier Institute (@LozierInstitute) December 1, 2021

During oral arguments, Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart cited 30 years of medical advances since the Casey decision, prompting pushback from Justice Sotomayor.

She challenged Mr. Stewart’s reference to fetal pain, a contentious medical and ethical issue. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists holds that the fetus cannot feel pain until 24 weeks of gestation, though some researchers say the time frame is as early as 12 to 20 weeks.

Justice Sotomayor said “the minority of people, the gross minority of doctors who believe fetal pain exists before 24 or 25 weeks, is a huge minority and one not well-founded in science at all.”

“So I don’t see how that really adds anything to the discussion, that a small fringe of doctors believe that pain could be experienced before a cortex is formed, doesn’t mean there has been that much of a difference since Casey,” she said.

However, a 2020 paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics said the evidence points toward an immediate and unreflective pain experience mediated by the developing function of the nervous system from as early as 12 weeks.

Dr. Pozo cited the paper as solid science that shouldn’t be denied.

“Not only does medicine agree that fetal anesthesia be administered for fetal surgery, a clear reflection of the medical consensus that unborn babies can feel pain, but like viability, the line marking when they feel pain continues to inch earlier,” he said.

David Prentice, vice president of research at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, said Justice Sotomayor should “follow the science.”

“Respectfully, we suggest that Justice Sotomayor follow the science, which has not stood still since Roe was decided in 1973,” he said. “Modern research is revealing that unborn babies do feel pain at an early stage, and we see that science in action regularly during fetal surgery, in which doctors apply analgesia in utero to prevent the suffering of the unborn child.”

Justice Sotomayor also quizzed Mr. Stewart about the health of the mother: “So when does the life of a woman and putting her at risk enter the calculus?”

She said the risk was “14 times greater to give birth to a child full-term than it is to have an abortion before viability.” She called the state’s position on abortion a “religious view.”

Maternal mortality fell dramatically from 607.9 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1915 to 12.7 in 2007, according to a study by the Health and Human Services Department.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the mortality rate has ticked up slightly in the past 35 years, from 7.2 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1987 to 17.3 in 2017. The main causes of death were cardiovascular conditions and infection.

TAGGED:TrendingWall Street Publication
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article 4K Ultra HD movie reviews: ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ and ‘The Addams Family’ 4K Ultra HD movie reviews: ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ and ‘The Addams Family’
Next Article Democrats’ smash-and-grab politics Democrats’ smash-and-grab politics

Editor's Pick

New Council of Financial Advisors report finds tariffs not inflicting inflation

New Council of Financial Advisors report finds tariffs not inflicting inflation

Former Trump administration head of financial coverage Tomas Philipson discusses President Trump’s commerce talks with South Korea and Japan, present…

By Editorial Board 4 Min Read
NBA Summer time League takeaways: Warriors rookie Will Richard makes debut vs. Spurs
NBA Summer time League takeaways: Warriors rookie Will Richard makes debut vs. Spurs

Richard makes debut SAN FRANCISCO – The Warriors‘ acquisition of their three…

5 Min Read
Moriah Plath Reveals Complete Hair Loss Attributable to Alopecia
Moriah Plath Reveals Complete Hair Loss Attributable to Alopecia

Studying Time: 3 minutes Moriah Plath is clearing the air, as a…

5 Min Read

Oponion

Rash of violence has some schools bringing back campus cops

Rash of violence has some schools bringing back campus cops

Communities across the country are rethinking their decision to remove…

November 2, 2021

How the federal government is bracing to be led by a felony fascist

In some methods, residing by way…

November 12, 2024

Kailyn Lowry Predicts The place She’ll Be in 15 Years

Studying Time: 3 minutes It’s beautiful,…

April 23, 2025

Letters: South Bay VTA strike leaving weak folks caught

VTA strike leavesvulnerable caughtAs a disabled…

March 14, 2025

Myanmar Military Attack Kills Dozens, Including Children, Aid Group Says

At least 38  people, including children, were…

December 26, 2021

You Might Also Like

“A Family’s Fight to Reclaim Their Legacy”
Trending

“A Family’s Fight to Reclaim Their Legacy”

Introduction: For generations, the Wright family has worked and lived on their land in Phillips County, Arkansas. But a battle…

5 Min Read
Streamline, Scale, Succeed: Why Global Enterprises Are Moving to Odoo ERP
TechTrending

Streamline, Scale, Succeed: Why Global Enterprises Are Moving to Odoo ERP

Introduction Global businesses face a growing need for centralized, scalable systems. Many still rely on disconnected software tools for operations,…

6 Min Read
Beloved Children’s Book 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒑 𝑴𝒚 𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒔 𝑮𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑴𝒆 Returns to Best-Seller Status Years After Its Release — and Fans Are Begging for More
LifestyleTrending

Beloved Children’s Book 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒂𝒑 𝑴𝒚 𝑴𝒐𝒎𝒔 𝑮𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑴𝒆 Returns to Best-Seller Status Years After Its Release — and Fans Are Begging for More

Years after its quiet but powerful debut, "The Map My Moms Gave Me" has reclaimed the spotlight — this time…

6 Min Read
Model With a Mission: In Conversation With Maurice Giovanni
EntertainmentTrending

Model With a Mission: In Conversation With Maurice Giovanni

There are models who simply wear clothes—and then there are models who wear the weight of experience, resilience, and purpose…

4 Min Read
The Wall Street Publication

About Us

The Wall Street Publication, a distinguished part of the Enspirers News Group, stands as a beacon of excellence in journalism. Committed to delivering unfiltered global news, we pride ourselves on our trusted coverage of Politics, Business, Technology, and more.

Company

  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability

Term of Use

  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices

© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?