This website collects cookies to deliver better user experience. Cookie Policy
Accept
Sign In
The Wall Street Publication
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
Share
The Wall Street PublicationThe Wall Street Publication
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.
The Wall Street Publication > Blog > Trending > Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
Trending

Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion

Editorial Board Published December 2, 2021
Share
Pro-life advocates urge liberal justices to ‘follow the science’ on abortion
SHARE

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said during Wednesday’s oral arguments in a case challenging Mississippi’s abortion law that “not much has changed” since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, but pro-life advocates disagreed, citing the science.

When Roe was decided, fetal viability began at about 28 weeks of gestation. Thanks to medical advances, the fetus is now considered viable at 23 or 24 weeks, and sometimes earlier. A baby girl born in Texas in 2014 at 21 weeks of gestation, weighing just 14.5 ounces, is reportedly thriving.

“The advances in science, technology, and medicine since 1973 that point to the humanity of the child and in particular the science of fetal pain,” the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List said in a Wednesday statement. “The other side claimed nothing has changed since 1973. They couldn’t be more wrong.”

Pro-life advocates jumped in after Justices Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor raised doubts about whether the landscape had changed since Roe and the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision, which barred states from prohibiting abortions before fetal viability.

“I guess what strikes me when I look at this case is that, you know, not much has changed since Roe and Casey,” Justice Kagan said during oral arguments. “People think it’s right or wrong based on the things that they have always thought it was right and wrong for.”

That may be true on the political front but not on the scientific front, according to pro-life advocates.

They argue that nearly 50 years of medical advances have swung the balance in their favor by improving survivability for premature infants by, for example, allowing doctors to treat conditions in the womb.

Seven years after Roe, University of California San Francisco doctors performed the first successful fetal surgery. Such procedures are now increasingly common midpregnancy to treat conditions such as spina bifida and heart defects. The unborn baby may also be administered anesthesia for open fetal surgery.

“As a practicing diagnostic radiologist, I can attest that advances in ultrasound technology continue to astonish the medical community as to the humanity of the unborn child, a truth and medical reality that we can now see clearly in the earliest weeks of life,” said Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, a senior fellow for The Catholic Association. 

The 2018 Mississippi law at issue in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization bans most abortions after 15 weeks of gestation. At this point, all the major organs have formed, each finger moves separately, and the body responds to touch and taste, according to the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute.

“This case is before the Supreme Court today in large part because Americans have seen the evolving science and increasingly want a voice in a question of great moral consequence,” said Dr. Pozo.

Justice Kagan: “Not much has changed since Roe and Casey.” Actually, there have been huge advancements in science and medicine, which CLI’s Dr. David Prentice discussed in this recent article: https://t.co/jenGmijAeS

— Charlotte Lozier Institute (@LozierInstitute) December 1, 2021

During oral arguments, Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart cited 30 years of medical advances since the Casey decision, prompting pushback from Justice Sotomayor.

She challenged Mr. Stewart’s reference to fetal pain, a contentious medical and ethical issue. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists holds that the fetus cannot feel pain until 24 weeks of gestation, though some researchers say the time frame is as early as 12 to 20 weeks.

Justice Sotomayor said “the minority of people, the gross minority of doctors who believe fetal pain exists before 24 or 25 weeks, is a huge minority and one not well-founded in science at all.”

“So I don’t see how that really adds anything to the discussion, that a small fringe of doctors believe that pain could be experienced before a cortex is formed, doesn’t mean there has been that much of a difference since Casey,” she said.

However, a 2020 paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics said the evidence points toward an immediate and unreflective pain experience mediated by the developing function of the nervous system from as early as 12 weeks.

Dr. Pozo cited the paper as solid science that shouldn’t be denied.

“Not only does medicine agree that fetal anesthesia be administered for fetal surgery, a clear reflection of the medical consensus that unborn babies can feel pain, but like viability, the line marking when they feel pain continues to inch earlier,” he said.

David Prentice, vice president of research at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, said Justice Sotomayor should “follow the science.”

“Respectfully, we suggest that Justice Sotomayor follow the science, which has not stood still since Roe was decided in 1973,” he said. “Modern research is revealing that unborn babies do feel pain at an early stage, and we see that science in action regularly during fetal surgery, in which doctors apply analgesia in utero to prevent the suffering of the unborn child.”

Justice Sotomayor also quizzed Mr. Stewart about the health of the mother: “So when does the life of a woman and putting her at risk enter the calculus?”

She said the risk was “14 times greater to give birth to a child full-term than it is to have an abortion before viability.” She called the state’s position on abortion a “religious view.”

Maternal mortality fell dramatically from 607.9 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1915 to 12.7 in 2007, according to a study by the Health and Human Services Department.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the mortality rate has ticked up slightly in the past 35 years, from 7.2 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1987 to 17.3 in 2017. The main causes of death were cardiovascular conditions and infection.

TAGGED:TrendingWall Street Publication
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article 4K Ultra HD movie reviews: ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ and ‘The Addams Family’ 4K Ultra HD movie reviews: ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ and ‘The Addams Family’
Next Article Democrats’ smash-and-grab politics Democrats’ smash-and-grab politics

Editor's Pick

UnitedHealth Group names new CEO, shares slide

UnitedHealth Group names new CEO, shares slide

UnitedHealth Group on Tuesday mentioned Chairman Stephen Hemsley will return to the helm of the well being care conglomerate, succeeding…

By Editorial Board 3 Min Read
Justin Baldoni Shares Emotional Message Amid Blake Vigorous Lawsuit
Justin Baldoni Shares Emotional Message Amid Blake Vigorous Lawsuit

Studying Time: 3 minutes Justin Baldoni has damaged his silence. In a…

5 Min Read
Krispy Kreme pauses nationwide doughnut rollout with McDonald’s
Krispy Kreme pauses nationwide doughnut rollout with McDonald’s

US Meals CEO Dave Flitman unpacks inflation worries on 'The Claman Countdown.'…

3 Min Read

Oponion

Guatemala’s cardinal trusts migration can be a precedence for subsequent pope as he readies for conclave

Guatemala’s cardinal trusts migration can be a precedence for subsequent pope as he readies for conclave

By Giovanna Dell’Orto | Related Press ROME — Cardinal Álvaro…

May 3, 2025

Elon Musk Calls Tesla ‘Recession-Resilient,’ as Wall Street Eyes Demand

BusinessEV maker said it is pressing…

October 20, 2022

Finest steak knife units

Which steak knife set is finest?…

February 20, 2025

Explaining the Proper: The imaginary scourge of noncitizen voting

Republicans in a number of states…

January 19, 2025

Apple Watch Ultra Review: Adventurous, Not Extreme

Gadgets are all about trade-offs, and…

September 21, 2022

You Might Also Like

Between Chalk and Care: The Two-World Legacy of Daniel from Ghana to Massachusetts
LifestyleTrending

Between Chalk and Care: The Two-World Legacy of Daniel from Ghana to Massachusetts

Daniel discreetly challenges the idea that we must make a single choice—between career options, between countries, between personal desire and…

10 Min Read
Triumph Over Adversity: Alex Martinez’s Inspiring Journey from Major Surgery to Amazon Success
Trending

Triumph Over Adversity: Alex Martinez’s Inspiring Journey from Major Surgery to Amazon Success

Success in business is often shaped not only by what you know, but by who you become on the path.…

5 Min Read
Donald Walker (A Man of Many Hats)
EntertainmentTrending

Donald Walker (A Man of Many Hats)

Born November 21, 1949 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Donald Walker is an American author, musician, bandleader, producer, song-writer and law enforcement…

14 Min Read
The Silent Weight of Privilege: Depression, Anhedonia, and the Psychoneuroimmunology of the 1%
LifestyleTrending

The Silent Weight of Privilege: Depression, Anhedonia, and the Psychoneuroimmunology of the 1%

By Ekaterina J. YarleyHealth Psychology PhD Candidate When we think of wealth, we imagine immunity. Immunity from hardship, from stress,…

6 Min Read
The Wall Street Publication

About Us

The Wall Street Publication, a distinguished part of the Enspirers News Group, stands as a beacon of excellence in journalism. Committed to delivering unfiltered global news, we pride ourselves on our trusted coverage of Politics, Business, Technology, and more.

Company

  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability

Term of Use

  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices

© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?