This website collects cookies to deliver better user experience. Cookie Policy
Accept
Sign In
The Wall Street Publication
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Reading: Mike Johnson seems like an fool after the Epstein vote
Share
The Wall Street PublicationThe Wall Street Publication
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Home
  • Trending
  • U.S
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Markets
    • Personal Finance
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Style
    • Arts
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.
The Wall Street Publication > Blog > Politics > Mike Johnson seems like an fool after the Epstein vote
Politics

Mike Johnson seems like an fool after the Epstein vote

Editorial Board Published November 19, 2025
Share
Mike Johnson seems like an fool after the Epstein vote
SHARE

Regardless of Home Speaker Mike Johnson’s greatest efforts to run interference for President Donald Trump, the invoice to drive his Pricey Chief to launch the Epstein information simply handed each chambers of Congress on Tuesday, and now heads to Trump’s desk for a signature.

The Epstein information saga is a complete and full loss for Johnson, who spent months attempting to persuade the general public that there was no want for them to see the paperwork associated to now-deceased convicted baby intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein, whereas on the similar time making an attempt to dam the laws that may drive Trump to launch the paperwork from ever getting a vote within the first place.

Ultimately, each efforts failed.

Mike Johnson seems like an fool after the Epstein vote
A cartoon by Clay Bennett.

Polls present that People overwhelmingly needed the information made public, and disapproved of Trump’s effort to cover them. For instance, an Economist/YouGov ballot performed Nov. 15-17 discovered that 80% suppose the federal government ought to launch the Epstein information, with a plurality (45%) believing that Trump knew one thing about Epstein’s crimes.

And Johnson’s effort to dam the invoice from passing failed spectacularly, with the Home voting 427-1 to drive Trump to launch the information the federal government has on Epstein, and the Senate unanimously passing the invoice shortly after the Home vote succeeded.

The truth that the Senate handed the invoice with out making any modifications to the laws was one more loss for Johnson, who on Tuesday stated he was solely voting for the invoice as a result of he had “some comfort” that Senate Majority Chief John Thune was going to amend the laws to guard the victims—which was actually code for giving Trump leeway to redact and conceal paperwork associated to Epstein.

“If and when it’s processed in the Senate … they’ll be able to correct some of those concerns that we have, the protection of victims and whistleblowers, etc,” Johnson stated.

Even after the invoice handed, Johnson was assured Thune would change the invoice textual content earlier than the Senate voted on it.

“I talked to John Thune over the weekend. I just texted him. We’re going to get together. We’ll talk about this,” Johnson instructed reporters after the vote wrapped, in keeping with Politico. “There’s an easy way to amend the legislation to make sure that we don’t do permanent damage to the justice system. And I’m going to insist upon that.”

But the Senate shortly handed the invoice after the Home vote—and not using a single change.

“I talked with the speaker a bit, and we’ve been in consultation obviously with the White House on this for some time,” Thune stated on Tuesday. “The conclusion was when it came out of the House 427-1 that, you know, it was going to pass in the Senate.”

After the Senate handed the invoice as is, Johnson instructed reporters that he was “deeply disappointed,” and even prompt that Trump might not signal the invoice.

“I was just told that [Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer rushed it to the floor and put it out there preemptively. It needed amendments. I just spoke to the president about that. We’ll see what happens,” Johnson stated.

In the end, Johnson’s efforts to guard Trump—who does not wish to launch the paperwork that his title seems in a number of occasions—have been an abject failure.

Trump is now in a critical bind.

If he indicators the invoice, he will likely be legally compelled to launch the unclassified supplies the federal government possesses on Epstein.

FILE - Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., speaks as FBI Director Kash Patel appears before the House Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Sept. 17, 2025. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File)
Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY)—who cosponsored the Epstein information invoice—instructed reporters on Tuesday after the laws handed that he’ll launch paperwork himself if Trump tries to dam them.

“This is not a subpoena, this is a law,” Massie stated, including that if Trump does not launch the information, he might go to the Home ground and skim the names of Epstein’s alleged purchasers himself. “Marjorie [Taylor Greene] would do that, I would do that, there are Democrats that would do that.”

If Trump vetoes the laws, it should create a firestorm that might trigger additional rifts in his MAGA coalition—which is splintering over disagreements about making the Epstein information public.

In the end, nevertheless, it is unclear once we will ever see the Epstein information.

The Division of Justice has not stated when it will launch the paperwork. And it is attainable the DOJ would attempt to use a loophole within the invoice—which says the DOJ can withhold paperwork if they might “jeopardize an energetic federal investigation or ongoing prosecution”—to delay their launch indefinitely.

On condition that Trump ordered Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi to analyze Democrats tied to Epstein, it is attainable she makes use of that sham excuse to justify withholding the information.

However any of these outcomes could be politically damaging for Trump, whose approval score has taken a beating and at the moment stands at an abysmal 40%. Ouch!   

TAGGED:EpsteinidiotJohnsonMikevote
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Zach Bryan Reveals He is Two Months Sober, Says He ‘Actually Wants Some F–king Assist’ Zach Bryan Reveals He is Two Months Sober, Says He ‘Actually Wants Some F–king Assist’
Next Article Russia pummels Ukraine with missiles and drones, killing no less than 25 as U.S. tries to revive peace talks Russia pummels Ukraine with missiles and drones, killing no less than 25 as U.S. tries to revive peace talks

Editor's Pick

Dominion Wealth Management: A Modern Steward of Global Wealth

Dominion Wealth Management: A Modern Steward of Global Wealth

In an increasingly complex and fast-moving financial world, sophisticated investors seek more than transactional advice. They look for enduring partnerships…

By Editorial Board 3 Min Read

Oponion

Overview: For dissatisfied ‘Civ’ followers, ‘Anno 117’ will scratch that technique itch

Overview: For dissatisfied ‘Civ’ followers, ‘Anno 117’ will scratch that technique itch

With “Sid Meier’s Civilization VII” a disappointment, “Anno” has a…

December 9, 2025

Kenny Regulation Reason behind Dying: ‘Moonshiners’ Star Passes Away at 68

Moonshiners star Kenny Regulation has handed…

January 17, 2025

Rudy Giuliani has one other horrible, no good, very dangerous day

After months of dragging his heels,…

January 17, 2025

DOJ slammed for charging Democratic congresswoman in ‘political stunt’

Democratic lawmakers are slamming the Trump…

May 20, 2025

Taylor Swift Donates So A lot Cash to Los Angeles Wildfires

Taylor Swift is as soon as…

January 17, 2025

You Might Also Like

A lot for the Trump regime’s ‘spiritual freedom’ hogwash
Politics

A lot for the Trump regime’s ‘spiritual freedom’ hogwash

The Trump administration by no means misses a chance to tout its deep dedication to non secular freedom.  Why, simply…

8 Min Read
Here is a present of some cartoons of Christmas previous
Politics

Here is a present of some cartoons of Christmas previous

Take pleasure in these further Merry Christmas cartoons—and please be happy to share extra of your favorites within the feedback. The…

1 Min Read
Every part you should learn about Christmas, and the way it has developed into a worldwide vacation
Politics

Every part you should learn about Christmas, and the way it has developed into a worldwide vacation

Christmas is a Christian vacation that observes the beginning of Jesus. However do you know that the earliest followers of Jesus…

10 Min Read
All the very best presents for the worst folks, courtesy of the Trump household
Politics

All the very best presents for the worst folks, courtesy of the Trump household

There’s by no means been a president—or a presidential household—so hyped to slap their identify on merchandise. It’s simply our…

8 Min Read
The Wall Street Publication

About Us

The Wall Street Publication, a distinguished part of the Enspirers News Group, stands as a beacon of excellence in journalism. Committed to delivering unfiltered global news, we pride ourselves on our trusted coverage of Politics, Business, Technology, and more.

Company

  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability

Term of Use

  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices

© 2024 The Wall Street Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?