The Scottish Inexperienced MSP who launched a scathing assault on the historic Supreme Courtroom definition of a girl has survived a committee push to take away her due to her personal vote.
Maggie Chapman, Deputy Convener of the Scottish Parliament’s Equality, Human Rights & Civil Justice committee (EHRC), was seen accusing the courtroom of “bigotry, prejudice and hatred” in a video taken at a rally in Aberdeen within the days following the choice.
Regardless of First Minister John Swinney declaring Chapman was “wrong” to query the choice of the judiciary, the North East MSP defiantly defended her choice to hit out on the Supreme Courtroom and insisted she wouldn’t apologise, stand down or rethink her place within the committee.
Her actions sparked a name for her removing from the EHRC group by Scottish Conservative committee member Tess White however the vote held on Tuesday morning noticed Maggie Chapman maintain on as Deputy Convener by 4 votes to a few.
Maggie Chapman was seen accusing the courtroom of ‘bigotry, prejudice and hatred’ in a video taken at a rally in Aberdeen
PA
Scottish Conservatives Tess White and Dr Pam Gosal MBE had been joined by Labour’s Paul O’Kane in voting for her removing, whereas Maggie Chapman was seen via the vote by the SNP Convenor Karen Adam, two different SNP committee members and her personal vote.
Chapman’s outburst sparked a curt letter of protest from the School of Advocates and Scotland’s prime lawyer to Chapman and EHRC Convenor, Karen Adam MSP.
Roddy Dunlop KC demanding a “fulsome and swift apology” and recommending Chapman’s feedback had been “not compatible” together with her function within the committee.
He wrote: “We suggest that a fulsome and swift apology is warranted,” including, “notwithstanding that the requirements apply only whilst acting in the capacity of Convenor, we suggest that her comments are not compatible with her role as Deputy Convenor, or, arguably, her continued membership of the Committee.”
“In addition to the suggested apology, and whatever action is taken by Adam or her colleagues relative to Chapman’s position on the Committee, we suggest that, in order to restore credibility in that Committee, Adam should speak out publicly in defence of the Court and of the Rule of Law.”
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
Her actions sparked a name for her removing from the EHRC group by Scottish Conservative committee member Tess White however the vote held on Tuesday morning noticed Maggie Chapman maintain on as Deputy Convener by 4 votes to a few
PA
Final week, Scotland’s Social Justice Secretary, Shirley-Anne Somerville, stated the Scottish Authorities “fully accepts” the ruling of the Supreme Courtroom.
The Cupboard Secretary supplied assurances that contemporary steering can be issued to public our bodies in step with the courtroom’s choice and that there have been “no plans” to resurrect the controversial Gender Recognition Reform Invoice, vetoed by the UK Authorities in January 2023.
Holyrood chief of the Alba Celebration, Ash Regan, has written to the Scottish Parliament Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone, to “formally raise concerns” about Maggie Chapman’s conduct.
Regan has been a steady supporter of For Girls Scotland all through their prolonged authorized battle with the Scottish Authorities, culminating within the Supreme Courtroom choice.
Referring to the incident recorded on the Aberdeen rally, she wrote, “Given Chapman’s place as Deputy Convenor of a committee tasked with scrutinising laws associated to equalities, human rights and civil justice, it’s particularly regarding that she would publicly discredit a ruling of the UK’s highest courtroom on such a delicate and legally vital matter.
Protesters took to the streets of Scotland after the Supreme Courtroom ruling
PA
“I consider these remarks to be incompatible with the standards of conduct expected of all MSPs and particularly of those in committee leadership positions.”
Reacting to the committee vote on X, former SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC stated, “Maggie Chapman saved by her personal vote and the committee convenor Karen Adam.
“Whatever happened to the principle that no one should be a judge in their own cause? This committee is not fit for purpose.”
Tess White, who instigated the vote, stated it was a “shameful day for equalities” after Ms Chapman refused a closing alternative to apologise earlier than the committee vote.
