PANAJI: Lower than two months in the past, the Goa Coastal Zone Administration Authority, chaired by IAS officer Arun Kumar Mishra, brushed apart a report by its three-member committee on “gross violations” towards the proprietor of the property on which the nightclub Birch by Romeo Lane stood, a British citizen named Surinder Kumar Khosla, and dropped proceedings towards him. Khosla had leased the land to Birch by Romeo Lane.The committee, which included an knowledgeable and two members of the coastal authority, mentioned there have been “alleged gross illegal constructions resulting in violations of CRZ notification 2011” and advisable that it ought to be deliberated by the Goa Coastal Zone Administration Authority (GCZMA) at its assembly and brought up for “further discussion”.
Goa Membership Fireplace Uncovered Lethal Design Errors, Trapping Dozens As Solely One Exit Functioned
However with out discussing or deliberating, coastal authority turned a blind eye to “gross violations” report and dropped proceedings on Oct 9 “There is no violation of CRZ notification in as much as the structures in question fall beyond CRZ area of the creek/ river,” the coastal authority mentioned, including it doesn’t have jurisdiction in areas not declared or notified as CRZ (Coastal Regulatory Zone).After the inspection, the committee had reported that the “RCC permanent structure is constructed fully into the water body” and there have been neither permissions nor NOCs from authorities involved for the development of a concrete construction.The committee discovered a RCC ground-plus-one construction “in roughly hexagon shape”, which “is erected in water body… ground floor is used as kitchen and storeroom area”, and the primary flooring, with coconut leaf roofing, is used as a restaurant.It was on the primary flooring {that a} hearth broke out Saturday, killing 25 folks, after electrical firecrackers hit the ceiling as a stomach dancer and her troupe carried out.However the coastal authority, chaired by Mishra who’s now posted in Delhi, dismissed the report and accepted the argument that “there is no environmental cause”.The Arpora-Nagoa panchayat had on Oct 31, 1996 issued an NOC to assemble a restaurant, employees quarters, compound wall, and later one other NOC on Aug 12, 2004 to renovate the restaurant.Regardless of the committee attaching a Google picture and the coastal zone administration plan (CZMP) extract, which confirmed the alleged violations, the coastal authority famous “that the CZMP for Goa had already been notified. The CZM indicates that the subject matter ground-plus-one RCC structure is outside the CRZ area”.The coastal authority report was the consequence of a criticism by Pradeep Ghadi Amonkar and Sunil Divkar Shetye on Dec 21, 2023, relating to unlawful development of Birch by Romeo Lane.
Businesses cross the buck after wetland vanishes
New Delhi: Who’s liable for a wetland close to Wazirabad disappearing? The Nationwide Inexperienced Tribunal isn’t any nearer to discovering a solution regardless of the the Municipal Company of Delhi and the Central Air pollution Management Board submitting their replies.On July 16, 2025, The Instances of India had reported that the wetland had been crammed up utilizing inert waste from the Bhalswa landfill. The report highlighted that the Jharoda pond, which supported wealthy plant and fowl life till 2023, had been buried underneath inert waste allegedly introduced from the Bhalswa landfill..Taking suo motu cognizance of the report titled ‘Find it if you can. Wetland near Wazirabad vanished under inert waste’, the tribunal had issued discover to the Municipal Company of Delhi (MCD), Central Air pollution Management Board (CPCB), Delhi Growth Authority (DDA), the North district Justice of the Peace, and the Delhi Air pollution Management Committee (DPCC) looking for an evidence on the matter. Solely MCD and CPCB have responded thus far, with each shifting blame to different companies.In its submissions MCD mentioned it was the duty of the non-public concessionaire appointed to flatten the Bhalswa landfill to make sure the inert materials was disposed of accurately. It additionally mentioned that the location belongs to DDA.In its reply, MCD mentioned it was not “dumping any form of waste at any wetland in the Wazirabad and Timarpur areas”. “The said site, where it has been alleged that waste is being dumped, is owned by Delhi Development Authority,” it mentioned.The civic physique additional said that it was merely following a 2019 order by the tribunal to get rid of 30 lakh MT of legacy waste from the Bhalswa landfill website, whereas including that it obtained a request from DDA to facilitate the availability of bioremediated inert materials on Could 24, 2023. It added that the company was neither concerned within the technique of identification of the location nor within the decision-making course of.The DDA order shared by MCD mentioned, “this office permits to supply inert and C&D material at DDA vacant low-lying area at both sides of the Marginal Bandh at Jharoda Majra, Burari.”CPCB, in the meantime, mentioned it had issued instructions in 2021 underneath Part 5 of the Atmosphere (Safety) Act, 1986, to all of the State Air pollution Management Boards and the Air pollution Management Committees for the enforcement of provisions of Stable Waste Administration Guidelines, 2016.“DPCC shall monitor and ensure compliance with the directions issued… DPCC shall also ensure enforcement of provisions of the SWM Rules 2016 by the concerned local authorities in Delhi,” said CPCB in a submission dated October 27, made obtainable on Dec 9.
