MUMBAI: Bombay HC refused to additional delay journey of a girl and her son, 9, to go to her mother and father in Singapore after her former husband sought to stop it. The journey was initially scheduled between Dec 22 and Jan 4.“I am not inclined to interfere with permission granted by family court (FC), which has entitled the respondent-mother and the minor son to travel to Singapore within the parameters set out by the court,” mentioned Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on Thursday.In Sept 2022, SC had dissolved the couple’s marriage and endorsed consent phrases. Neither would take their son out of India with out 4 weeks’ prior intimation to the opposite. In contempt proceedings filed by each, SC on Jan 19 mentioned consent phrases may very well be modified by an applicable authorized discussion board. So, after FC’s order, the daddy moved HC trip bench, saying the mom is a flight threat as she and the son are Singapore residents.Senior advocate Abad Ponda mentioned his curiosity can be jeopardised if his son doesn’t return. Justice Sundaresan mentioned quite the opposite consent phrases bind the events, and “it is incumbent on the father to ensure there is no impediment to such travel… envisaged in consent terms”.The mom’s advocate, Mrunalini Deshmukh, mentioned it was recognized she and the son are Singapore residents throughout signing of consent phrases. She referred to the mom’s endeavor to FC to return as scheduled on Jan 4. Justice Sundaresan mentioned the daddy’s flight threat apprehension is allayed by the mom’s undertakings to FC, and reiterated in individual to HC.The daddy raised a difficulty with the mom’s renewal of leave-and-licence settlement. The decide mentioned it “does not turn the needle in favour of preventing departure of the respondent and the minor son on the proposed vacation trip. I see no basis to hold up any further, the proposed travel. He further noted that having delayed the original departure, the mother was willing to incur additional expense to book fresh tickets to be able to travel forthwith. Justice Sundaresan declined Ponda’s request to interview the child, saying the consent terms “are loud and clear in relation to such travel”.
Supply hyperlink
