CNN’s high political anchors panned Democratic vice presidential hopeful Tim Walz’s debate efficiency, although they splintered on precisely what went awry.
“I think there was a clear lack of preparation and execution here,” anchor Abby Phillip stated on a panel whereas noting how Republican vice presidential hopeful JD Vance managed to land some “punches.”
CNN’s high political anchors panned Democratic vice presidential hopeful Tim Walz’s debate efficiency. CNN
Jake Tapper acknowledged that “JD Vance is much more experienced with this, at public speaking and defending himself and pivoting,” whereas Anderson Cooper concluded that Walz appeared nervous on stage. AP
Host Dana Bash posited that Walz had the other challenge.
“I think he had too much preparation. He had so many lines that he was clearly trying to say,” Bash stated. “I think the lack of interviews that he has done with national media, with local media — it showed he needed more.”
Jake Tapper acknowledged that “JD Vance is much more experienced with this, at public speaking and defending himself and pivoting,” whereas Anderson Cooper concluded that Walz appeared nervous on stage.
Supply hyperlink
