Choose denies Elon Musk’s request to dam OpenAI for-profit conversion however welcomes trial

By MATT O’BRIEN and BARBARA ORTUTAY | Related Press

OAKLAND — A federal choose has denied Elon Musk’s request for a court docket order blocking OpenAI from changing itself to a for-profit firm however stated she might expedite a trial to contemplate Musk’s claims towards the ChatGPT maker and its CEO.

U.S. District Choose Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dominated late Tuesday that “Musk has not demonstrated likelihood of success on the merits” in his request for a preliminary injunction. She supplied to carry a trial in her California courtroom as quickly as this fall, “given the public interest at stake and potential for harm if a conversion contrary to law occurred.”

Musk, an early OpenAI investor, started a authorized offensive towards the ChatGPT maker and CEO Sam Altman a 12 months in the past, suing for breach of contract over what he stated was the betrayal of its founding goals as a nonprofit.

He escalated the authorized dispute late final 12 months, including new claims and defendants, together with Microsoft, and asking for a court docket order that will cease OpenAI’s plans to transform itself right into a for-profit enterprise. Musk additionally added his personal AI firm, xAI, as a plaintiff, claiming that OpenAI was unfairly stifling enterprise competitors.

He and a gaggle of traders extra lately made an unsolicited $97.4 billion bid to purchase a controlling stake within the nonprofit — a transfer that undermined Musk’s “claim of irreparable harm,” the choose wrote.

OpenAI stated it welcomed the court docket’s resolution.

RELATED: Editorial: Musk bid for OpenAI exposes hypocrisy of enterprise mannequin

Musk alleges within the lawsuit that the businesses are violating the phrases of his foundational contributions to the charity. He had invested about $45 million within the startup from its founding till 2018, his lawyer has stated.

Musk legal professional Marc Toberoff stated in a press release late Tuesday that he’s happy that the court docket supplied an expedited trial on the core claims.

“We look forward to a jury confirming that Altman accepted Musk’s charitable contributions knowing full well they had to be used for the public’s benefit rather than his own enrichment,” Toberoff stated.

Gonzalez Rogers in a listening to final month referred to as it a “ stretch” to assert “irreparable harm ” to Musk, and she or he referred to as the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested tens of hundreds of thousands in OpenAI and not using a written contract. Toberoff responded that it was as a result of the connection between Altman and Musk on the time was “built on trust” and the 2 have been very shut.

“That is just a lot of money” to speculate “on a handshake,” the choose stated.

The dispute has roots in a 2017 inner energy battle on the fledgling startup that led to Altman turning into OpenAI’s CEO.

Emails disclosed by OpenAI present Musk had additionally sought to be CEO and grew annoyed after two different OpenAI co-founders stated he would maintain an excessive amount of energy as a serious shareholder and chief govt if the startup succeeded in its objective to attain better-than-human AI often called synthetic basic intelligence. Musk has lengthy voiced considerations about how superior types of AI might threaten humanity.

Altman ultimately succeeded in turning into CEO and has remained so aside from a interval in 2023 when he was fired after which reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was changed.

Gonzalez Rogers, appointed by then-President Barack Obama in 2011, has dealt with numerous tech trade circumstances together with Apple’s combat with Epic Video games, although she stated final month that Musk’s case is “nothing like” that one. That case was additionally the final time she granted a preliminary injunction, eight months earlier than the case went to trial.

___

O’Brien reported from Windfall, Rhode Island.

___

The Related Press and OpenAI have a licensing and know-how settlement that enables OpenAI entry to a part of AP’s textual content archives.

Initially Revealed: March 5, 2025 at 7:20 AM PST