A brand new ballot has discovered that Canadians are divided on Indigenous rights.
The ballot, commissioned by the Angus Reid Institute, discovered that whereas a slight majority of Canadians really feel that Indigenous Peoples have a novel standing in Canada (55 per cent), and the overwhelming majority of Indigenous-identifying people agree (68 per cent), others push again (45 per cent), saying Indigenous Peoples ought to have the identical standing as others dwelling in fashionable Canada, together with two in three Conservative celebration voters (68 pre cent).
“So whether or not they believe that Indigenous Peoples have an inherently unique status or whether they should not have a special status that other Canadians have.”
Story continues under commercial
The ballot discovered that the majority Canadians are divided on lots of the points.
Three in 10 of these polled mentioned that the federal authorities is providing an excessive amount of funding to First Nations communities, however the identical quantity, 27 per cent, felt the present funding is just too little.
One in 5, 21 per cent, of these polled mentioned that based mostly on what they know, the funding degree is about proper.
“On the issue of whether or not they should be integrating more into broader Canadian society, 45 per cent said yeah, Indigenous people should be doing that, but there are more Canadians who say that they should strengthen their own culture and traditions at 55 per cent,” Roe mentioned.
Get breaking Nationwide information
“But when it comes to the idea of moving towards more independence and control of their own affairs, 40 per cent of Canadians say that, whereas 60 per cent say they want them to be Indigenous Peoples, to be governed by the same systems and rules as other Canadians.”
2:13New ballot on attitudes in the direction of Canadian immigration
Terry Teegee, Regional Chief of the British Columbia Meeting of First Nations, mentioned he discovered the ballot disappointing.
Story continues under commercial
“I’m not surprised that this is coming from the right and from a Conservative point of view,” he mentioned.
“Matter of fact, I think it’s creating more harm than good.”
Teegee mentioned that First Nations individuals lead the statistics on many social points, together with housing and habit, and people must be addressed.
“When you bring in a poll that looks at the funding that we receive, there’s not enough information to make an informed decision by any person in the public, or whether they’re Conservative or otherwise,” he mentioned.
“There’s a lot of information missing in terms of these types of polls, and it makes it look like that First Nations are really not reporting on the funding we received, that we’re not doing the work that we’re supposed to be doing, it’s creating more harm than good. And, you know, this creates problems.”
Trending Now
Lady arrested after posting threats to kidnap, kill Trump on social media
Canada isn’t in a housing stoop — Ontario is, RBC evaluation exhibits
When requested whether or not their province is giving an excessive amount of consideration to Indigenous communities, a mean of 24 per cent within the nation mentioned sure, however that quantity climbed to 37 per cent in B.C.
“It is a bit higher of people saying maybe they do spend more time here than other parts of the country,” Roe mentioned.
3:03Poll exhibits Canadians help extra schooling on Air India bombings
Teegee mentioned there are numerous assumptions about Indigenous Peoples throughout Canada
Story continues under commercial
“I think that it’s very harmful to many First Nations and Indigenous Peoples here in British Columbia because it really stokes the fire of racism in terms of looking at the First Nations here in B.C.,” he mentioned.
“What should be addressed here is education, the understanding of many First Nations of what we experience in this day and age.”
Methodology:
The Angus Reid Institute performed an internet survey from July 24 – 29, 2025, amongst a randomized pattern of two,508 Canadian adults who’re members of Angus Reid Discussion board. The pattern was weighted to be consultant of adults nationwide based on area, gender, age, family revenue, and schooling, based mostly on the Canadian census. For comparability functions solely, a likelihood pattern of this measurement would carry a margin of error of +/- 1.5 share factors, 19 occasions out of 20. Discrepancies in or between totals are because of rounding. The survey was self-commissioned and paid for by ARI.
