A coalition of Democratic-led states sued the Trump administration on Monday, accusing it of hijacking federal crime sufferer funding in a bid to strain states into helping with immigration enforcement.
The lawsuit, filed by 20 states and Washington, D.C., claims the Justice Division has illegally tied entry to Victims of Crime Act funds to cooperation with President Donald Trump’s deportation crackdown—a transfer the states describe as “unprecedented.” All concerned states have Democratic attorneys normal.
“The challenged conditions would force these States into an untenable position: either forfeit access to critical resources for vulnerable crime victims and their families, or accept unlawful conditions, allowing the federal government to conscript state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law and destroying trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities that is critical to preventing and responding to crime,” the criticism states.
At stake is sort of $1.2 billion in VOCA funding this 12 months. Attorneys normal from California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and different states argue that the cash helps thousands and thousands of individuals yearly—protecting emergency shelters, forensic exams, funeral prices, and psychological well being counseling.
With out it, they warn, packages for victims of home violence, sexual assault, and different crimes may very well be gutted or shut down fully.
“This brazen attempt to use funding that supports our most vulnerable residents to strong-arm California and states nationwide into doing the federal government’s job for it, is blatantly beyond the power of the President,” mentioned California Legal professional Common Rob Bonta.
Congress created VOCA in 1984 to assist crime victims—to not form immigration coverage. Practically all VOCA funds have to be distributed to states by fastened statutory formulation, limiting the manager department’s discretion. But beneath Trump, the Justice Division’s Workplace for Victims of Crime has informed states they can not entry the funds until they align along with his deportation agenda.
Democratic attorneys normal argue this can be a energy seize—an finish run round Congress’ management of federal spending.
“In enacting these grant programs, Congress’s focus was crystal clear: the funds must be used to help victims,” their criticism states. “Yet the Office for Victims of Crime … has now declared that States will be unable to access VOCA funds unless they accede to the Executive Branch’s immigration enforcement priorities.”
The states are asking a federal decide to dam the administration from implementing the coverage, which they name each unconstitutional and harmful.
Associated | Trump’s despicable deportation machine is shedding steam
It’s the newest chapter in Trump’s months-long conflict with Democratic-led states over immigration. Since returning to the White Home in January, he has made dismantling state and native “sanctuary” safety of immigrants a high precedence, framing them as threats to public security. His vengeance-seeking Justice Division, led by Legal professional Common Pam Bondi, has already focused cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York in lawsuits aimed toward stripping away these protections.
Nonetheless, the attorneys normal argue that what Trump is doing now crosses a brand new line. By placing VOCA funding in danger, he’s threatening shelters, hotlines, and counseling companies that survivors of violent crime rely on. They warn that it could deepen distrust between immigrant communities and native police, making neighborhoods much less secure.
The transfer additionally follows a well-recognized sample for Trump: penalizing states for resisting deportation efforts, whilst that system has slowed as a consequence of administrative delays and courtroom challenges. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in the meantime, faces public backlash over its illegal raids and detention practices.
Trump has repeatedly tried to make use of federal {dollars} as leverage towards blue states and cities, from threatening to withhold regulation enforcement grants to blocking catastrophe reduction. His newest cynical ploy makes crime victims the goal of his pettiness.
That’s what makes this combat particularly cynical. Trump talks about being powerful on crime, however his Justice Division is now dangling crime sufferer funds as leverage in a battle over immigration. It’s one other reminder of his governing model: vindictive and prepared to punish the weak for political achieve.
